NuScale – Revitalizing Nuclear Power

NuScale Power helps revitalize nuclear power industry and could be positioned for water desalination in future.

http://trinitynews.ie/could-nuclear-power-solve-our-energy-crisis/

Because of climate change, the nuclear power industry has been revitalized and one company (NuScale) has developed innovative small nuclear power plant designs that are better for climate change and, in my opinion, is in a position to further take advantage of the process of using nuclear reactors to do water desalination.

I’ll start with a little clarification first.  Although the clouds of white “smoke” from a nuclear reactor may seem like it contributes to the climate changing pollution, in reality, the steam emitted from a nuclear power reactor is simply water that has been heated to a degree that turns it into steam.  So it has a similar impact on the environment as water evaporating into the air and forming clouds.

On the other hand, “Coal plants are the nation’s top source of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the primary cause of global warming” [2].  Nuclear power is being revitalized because it can help mitigate climate change.  The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is a respected international agency that helps evaluate adherence to nuclear (or atomic) energy regulations.  The IAEA Director General stated that because of its low carbon emissions nuclear power can play a significant role in mitigating climate change [3].

One of the challenges of nuclear power has been the high cost of developing a new reactor because each reactor has been custom designed and built to adhere to strict and demanding regulatory requirements.  Each power plant has to be specially designed and approved for the specific location where it is built.  As a nuclear engineer, I have been impressed with the depth of engineering involved in nuclear power plants.  One company that has impressed me for their approach to the challenge of costly construction is NuScale.  Their website says, “NuScale has designed an extraordinarily safe Integral Pressurized Water Reactor (IPWR) based on light water reactor technology proven in operation for over 70 years. NuScale intends to commercialize power plants that are modular and scalable in 50 MWe (gross) increments. Using simplified, passive technology, NuScale’s design reduces complexity, improves safety, enhances operability, and reduces risks” [4].  They build smaller reactors that can be manufactured in a factory and delivered via truck to the site of the new reactors.  Because of their standard designs, they can be approved much faster.

nuscale-trucking-part-of-nuclear-reactor

[5]

The picture shows the contrast between on-sight construction of the large reactor compared to trucking in the pre-manufactured part and installing it.  Think of the smaller footprint this will require to build nuclear reactors.  Another benefit is the efficiency gained by avoiding the transmission losses of electricity over long distances because the smaller power plants can be built near where the power is needed.  I think NuScale has created a solution that can really help reduce the emissions that cause climate change.

I also think NuScale is positioned well for further advances in helping mitigate impacts of climate change by using nuclear reactors to perform water desalination.  Nuclear power plants have been used for water desalination for many years, but they are the big reactors that are producing electricity most of the time, but are repurposed to water desalination during times of lower demand for power [6].

The concept of water purification through boiling has an interesting visual provided by Dean Kamen who invented the Segway.  He explains the process that can purify very dirty water, even water with biological waste in it, and drink it afterward [7,8].  His machine, called the Slingshot, heats the temperature of the water so that it boils the dirty water until the water turns into steam.  For clarification, steam is pure water in the gaseous state of matter.  So the machine captures the pure water in steam format and cools it down so that it condenses back into the liquid form and becomes pure water.  The water is perfectly safe for human consumption regardless of its initial dirtiness.  One of the challenges of his method of water purification is the small scale of process.

NuScale could build off its small modular reactor design to create small, yet capable water purification systems near where the water will be needed.  Water, of whatever quality, could be brought to the system and then purified for use.  If climate change continues, then demand for potable water may increase to the point where the economics of purifying water with a nuclear reactor make sense.

Is it realistic that one day we may use nuclear reactors to purify water?

(736 words)

 

Sources:

[1] Picture: http://trinitynews.ie/could-nuclear-power-solve-our-energy-crisis/

[2] http://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/coal-and-other-fossil-fuels/coal-air-pollution#.WBxcwPorLb0

[3] http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/CCANP16web-86692468.pdf

[4] http://www.nuscalepower.com/our-technology

[5] Picture: http://www.nuscalepower.com/smr-benefits/small

[6] http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/non-power-nuclear-applications/industry/nuclear-desalination.aspx

[7] https://www.engadget.com/2008/04/23/dean-kamen-aims-to-clean-water-generate-electricity-with-slings/

[8] Segway inventor drinks his own pee (really) http://www.ocregister.com/articles/water-4371-really-people.html

 

Previous:

The Renault-Nissan Alliance: How the global leader in electric vehicles is combating climate change

Next:

Let’s Go Fly a Kite – SkySails and Climate Change

4 thoughts on “NuScale – Revitalizing Nuclear Power

  1. Nuclear certainly has got a bad rep since the Fukushima disaster, which is unfortunate since it can be a very sustainable source of energy.

    Nuclear energy however also has its limitations as the plant takes a long time to switch on and off. Hence, nuclear plants have to be running at all times to form “baseload” generation. Unfortunately there are also a lot of existing baseload generators connected to the grid, making the costs of building a nuclear plant not easily justifiable.

    Further, many of these baseload generators have long-term supply contracts for coal and other cheap forms fuel (Coal and gas form 66% of energy generation in the U.S. according to the EIA – https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3), and the coal and gas industries have strong unions and lobbying groups.

    Hence, while nuclear does present a strong value proposition, it is fighting an uphill battle against having a bad rep for being potentially very dangerous, and mammoth commodity industries.

  2. The idea of localized nuclear is very compelling from the standpoint of sustainability in addition to minimizing energy yields lost in distribution / transmission.

    However, there are a number of concerns associated with nuclear – some of which are generic to any nuclear plant (e.g., disposal of nuclear waste), while others would be accentuated with the proliferation of local nuclear plants (e.g., safety and security concerns). While operating at increasing scale could improve the costs associated with the disposal of nuclear waste, security concerns will continue to raise questions, particularly in the communities near where these new plants might be built. [1]

    [1] http://allthingsnuclear.org/elyman/safety-and-security-concerns-about-small-modular-reactors-nuscales-design?, accessed Nov. 2016

  3. Nuclear energy is definitely compelling and developing a 50MW facility that is economically feasible is today not a reality. Hopefully NuScale can do this as it would add much cleaner energy to our grids worldwide.
    I personally believe there are many concerns with nuclear including safety and disposal.
    Safety – after Fukushima many nuclear power plants world wide have been shut down. This also leads us to think of the political willingness to approve for such facilities.
    Dispsoal – disposing of nuclear waste is an issue. Today we are still trying to figure out where to put the waste! Fortunately a company is already investing in this. They plan to generate electricity out of nuclear waste. The company is Transatomic (out of MIT). http://www.transatomicpower.com/

    To your comment about using nuclear energy to desalinate water. I believe that the question would be, what is the cheapest electricity that can lead us to desalinate water. Nuclear atleast today does not have the lowest electrical cost according to Lazard’s LCOE https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-analysis-90/
    Hopefully we do find a technology that allows us to economically desalinate water!

  4. Great article. I have been a long time believer in nuclear power as the ultimate solution for global warming. As nuclear power plants become smaller and safer, and storage / disposal technology for nuclear waste improves over time, nuclear will surely emerge as the safest, cleanest, and cheapest form of energy.

Leave a comment