IndieGoGo: Supply and Demand -> Demand and Supply

How IndieGoGo is redefining the interaction between supply and demand to revolutionize the way that ideas are funded

IndieGoGo is a crowdfunding platform that connects entrepreneurs with product ideas to their would-be customers. An entrepreneur with a product idea can start a campaign on IndieGoGo to introduce the product and explain the development and funding needs. The other side of the platform, customers, can review campaigns and “back” the products they are interested in by essentially pre-purchasing the product as a way to fund its development. Essentially, IndieGoGo is leveraging crowds to change how innovation is funded.

What kind of changes does this model produce?

  • Supply and Demand: the IndieGoGo model reverses the traditional dynamics of supply and demand. Typically, a company will consider its own competencies and use a collection of assumptions to supply a product, and true demand (actual willingness to purchase) is only discovered once the product has been launched. IndieGoGo allows demand to dictate what is supplied, and products that do not generate enough demand are not invested in.
  • Supply chain: because the delivery date is in the future, the entrepreneur can plan production of their first batch according to a known demand level (no speculative inventory), allowing them to conserve resources at an early stage when cash flow is particularly critical. The platform is the channel to customers so the entrepreneur keeps a greater share of the revenue to invest in scaling after launch
  • Investment: entrepreneurs do not have to invest upfront and take on demand risk. The funding process reveals initial demand, so the decision of whether or not to invest, as well as level of investment, is driven by proven demand.
  • Marketing: the entrepreneur does not have to invest in extensive pre-revenue marketing and advertising. Once the first batch is delivered, good products will benefit from word-of-mouth advertising before the product is then commercially launched at a greater scale

Incentivizing Participation:

Entrepreneurs are incentivized to seek crowdfunding as they can bring their products to market at a low cost – they don’t have to pay heavily in equity or debt servicing to launch their products. Use of the platform also provides them with many of the benefits listed above. Customers are incentivized by the “perks of backing” (typically being able to pre-purchase the product at a discount from the intended retail price), as well as satisfaction from their preferences being influential in investment decisions that they are personally removed from.

Challenges:

The platform is reliant on cross-side network effects between product entrepreneurs and supporting customers to drive value. IndieGoGo does not assume any liability for product quality, but negative experiences with the actual products are likely to drive customers off of the platform, creating substantial reputation risk.

The traditional investment model usually involves seasoned professionals reviewing business plans, so the plan has to be defensible before it is funded. With IndieGoGo, the entrepreneur’s funding needs are not verified, so there is a greater risk of funding shortfalls and failure to deliver.

Value Creation and Capture:

The changes that IndieGoGo creates (as listed above) both create value and mitigate value destruction (e.g. by preventing investment in unpopular ideas) for platform participants. The platform also creates value by using scale to offer support to entrepreneurs at a lower cost. Support mechanisms include: analytics, marketing and promotion, and fulfillment support.

IndieGoGo monetizes through a 5% commission on total funds for each campaign. Given that IndieGoGo has an asset-light and low-risk model, there may be pressure in the future to lower the commission rate.

Growth Potential:

Scalability of the platform is feasible, because of the asset-light model that IndieGoGo uses. However, as the number of campaigns grows, it will require improvements such as:

  • improved search capabilities (currently limited)
  • greater categorization of campaigns
  • lowering costs to bring more customers on to the platform
  • more mechanisms to create visibility for individual campaigns
  • more robust support mechanisms (e.g.analytics)

 

Previous:

Vetr: Crowdsourcing Stock Ratings

Next:

Waze: “Help[ing] people create local driving communities that work together to improve the quality of everyone’s daily driving”

5 thoughts on “IndieGoGo: Supply and Demand -> Demand and Supply

  1. Do you think IndieGoGo has real runway to grow, and serve an increasing diversity of companies through a wider range of stages? Dealing with bad actors on the entrepreneur side is clearly an issue, but it seems like there are a lot of aspects of the angel investing relationship that IndieGoGo is not well equipped to replace – I’d be curious to know how bright you think their outlook is.

  2. I don’t think that the model would translate well to later-stage or non-product-based companies as the pre-purchase model would not be applicable, and therefore the incentive for crowdfunders dissipates; but given the democratization of innovation in today’s world, I think that we can expect a greater emergence of seed-stage product companies that can better satisfy the increasingly diverse preferences of customers than conglomerates with cumbersome cost structures and legacy assets would – and therefore IndieGoGo still could have a long runway of growth purely from greater participation on both sides of the existing platform.

  3. Noorin – very interesting post. I definitely see how they are solving the complicated chicken and egg conundrum. I can also see how they are achieving a level of crowd information just by the fact that the proposed products who don’t get enough support likely don’t get made. My question is whether or not, for the products who do get supported by the crowd, the producer uses feedback or opinions from the financial backers to improve the product?

    1. My understanding is that after product delivery they are free to contact the backers/buyers for feedback and incorporate their insights in to the next development cycle, but they don’t have to either

  4. Very interesting post! Indiegogo has done a lot over the past few years to transition from serving primarily as a crowdfunding company to supporting entrepreneurs throughout the process of bringing their ideas to market. Currently it seems like Indiegogo staffs internally to support entrepreneurs in marketing, product development, etc – I wonder if there is an opporutnity for them to engage crowds beyond simply fundraising in their GTM support functions.

Leave a comment